(Added authors and description) |
(Added pictures) |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
The design posed the challenge of enabling local communities to have a say in the design process in order to satisfy demands for safety, noise control and landscape impact, previously raised by residents during initial consultation stages. The two-stage competition included an intermediate consultation phase which Relational Urbanism design team used to deploy innovative tools for participation. These consisted in a skate park modelling - digitizing environment made up of a sandbox and 3D cloud capturing via Kinect. Participants could model with their hand the skate park they wanted with simple tools (wooden spheres, cylinders and small trowels). These models were later captured and brought into a 3D model which ultimately formed part of the overall proposal. The use of the modeling tool was deemed a success during the participatory event, where different members of the BMX community being actively engaged in the design process. This also encouraged senior members of the community to bring their views on safety and pedestrian issues. Similar events also took place in local schools, giving younger members of the community bring their ideas about play spaces. | The design posed the challenge of enabling local communities to have a say in the design process in order to satisfy demands for safety, noise control and landscape impact, previously raised by residents during initial consultation stages. The two-stage competition included an intermediate consultation phase which Relational Urbanism design team used to deploy innovative tools for participation. These consisted in a skate park modelling - digitizing environment made up of a sandbox and 3D cloud capturing via Kinect. Participants could model with their hand the skate park they wanted with simple tools (wooden spheres, cylinders and small trowels). These models were later captured and brought into a 3D model which ultimately formed part of the overall proposal. The use of the modeling tool was deemed a success during the participatory event, where different members of the BMX community being actively engaged in the design process. This also encouraged senior members of the community to bring their views on safety and pedestrian issues. Similar events also took place in local schools, giving younger members of the community bring their ideas about play spaces. | ||
[[File:Eduardo rico 1.jpeg|left|500x500px]] | |||
The tool opened conversations of what constitutes a good integration between skate and play landscapes in public space. Details of skate bowls (spines, main layout) were understood via the use of the model. Landscape mounds to mitigate noise and visual impact were incorporated as well as changes in the overall park layout to secure visual connection of play areas to avoid issues of anti- social behavior. | The tool opened conversations of what constitutes a good integration between skate and play landscapes in public space. Details of skate bowls (spines, main layout) were understood via the use of the model. Landscape mounds to mitigate noise and visual impact were incorporated as well as changes in the overall park layout to secure visual connection of play areas to avoid issues of anti- social behavior. | ||
The result was a design that managed to incorporate the view of the final users and addressed many of the concerns of local communities. This was made evident in comments of competition panel, who judged the design to meet their expectations as well as in the smooth planning approval that ensued, were local communities did not object to issues of noise and visual intrusion. | The result was a design that managed to incorporate the view of the final users and addressed many of the concerns of local communities. This was made evident in comments of competition panel, who judged the design to meet their expectations as well as in the smooth planning approval that ensued, were local communities did not object to issues of noise and visual intrusion. | ||
[[File:Eduardo rico 2.jpeg|left|500x500px]] | |||
[[File:Eduardo rico 3.jpeg|left|500x500px]] | |||
[[File:Submission - Eduardo Rico (via email).jpg|left|500x500px]] | |||
<br /> | <br /> |
Revision as of 11:54, 9 September 2020
Author: |
relational urbanism + Levins + Robert Barry + mcelligot |
Dublin, ireland, 2020 | |
The design posed the challenge of enabling local communities to have a say in the design process in order to satisfy demands for safety, noise control and landscape impact, previously raised by residents during initial consultation stages. The two-stage competition included an intermediate consultation phase which Relational Urbanism design team used to deploy innovative tools for participation. These consisted in a skate park modelling - digitizing environment made up of a sandbox and 3D cloud capturing via Kinect. Participants could model with their hand the skate park they wanted with simple tools (wooden spheres, cylinders and small trowels). These models were later captured and brought into a 3D model which ultimately formed part of the overall proposal. The use of the modeling tool was deemed a success during the participatory event, where different members of the BMX community being actively engaged in the design process. This also encouraged senior members of the community to bring their views on safety and pedestrian issues. Similar events also took place in local schools, giving younger members of the community bring their ideas about play spaces.
The tool opened conversations of what constitutes a good integration between skate and play landscapes in public space. Details of skate bowls (spines, main layout) were understood via the use of the model. Landscape mounds to mitigate noise and visual impact were incorporated as well as changes in the overall park layout to secure visual connection of play areas to avoid issues of anti- social behavior.
The result was a design that managed to incorporate the view of the final users and addressed many of the concerns of local communities. This was made evident in comments of competition panel, who judged the design to meet their expectations as well as in the smooth planning approval that ensued, were local communities did not object to issues of noise and visual intrusion.
- Purpose Activation
- Mechanics Alternative reality
- Mechanics Role play
- Mechanics Rule based play
- Mechanics Location based
- Mechanics Simulations
- Mechanics Mapping
- Mechanics Geolocation
- Mechanics Hypothesis
- Mechanics Metagame
- Technology Tools Analoge Tangibles
- Technology Tools AR VR
- Technology Tools Audio Visual
- Technology Tools Data AI
- Technology Tools Data Collection Visualization
- Technology Tools Digital Interface
- Technology Tools Mobile
- Aesthetics Sensation
- Aesthetics Imagination
- Aesthetics Assemblage
- Aesthetics Physical activity construction
- Aesthetics Realism
- Scale Metropolitan
- Scale City
- Scale District
- Scale Neighbourhood
- Scale Street
- Scale Undefined
- Audience Community
- Audience Planning expert
- Audience Stakeholders
- Audience Policy Makers
- Scope Individual
- Scope Small group
- Scope Large group
- Scope Crowd
- Scope Pre-defined